References

1. 1. Amar S.,
   2. Baguelin F.,
   3. Frank R.,
   4. Jezequel J. F.

   (1977) in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Soft Clay, Bangkok, The self-boring placement method and soft clay investigation, eds Brenner R. P., Brand E. W. (Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok), pp 337–357.
2. (1975) Methods of Tests for Soils for Civil Engineering Purposes, B. S. 1377 (British Standards Institution, London). Anon.
3. (1981) Code of Practice for Site Investigations, B. S. 5930 (British Standards Institution, London). Anon.
4. 1. Barker R. D.,
   2. Worthington P. F.

   (1973) Some hydrogeophysical properties of the Bunter Sandstone of Northwest England. Geoexploration 11:151–170.

   OpenUrl
5. 1. Barton N.,
   2. Lien R.,
   3. Lunde J.

   (1974) Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mechanics 6(4):189–236.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. 1. Begemann H. K. S. Ph.

   (1965) Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Montreal, The friction jacket cone as an aid determining the soil profile, 1, pp 17–20.

   OpenUrl
7. 1. Bell F. G.

   (1978) in Foundation Engineering in Difficult Ground, In situ testing and geophysical surveying, ed Bell F. G. (Butterworths, London), pp 233–280.
8. 1. Bieniawski Z. T.

   (1976) Proceedings of the Symposium on Exploration for Rock Engineering, Rock mass classifications in rock engineering (Johannesburg. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam), 1, pp 97–106.

   OpenUrl
9. 1. Bjerrum L.

   (1973) Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Moscow, Problems of soil mechanics and construction on soft clays and structurally unstable soils, 3, pp 111–159.

   OpenUrl
10. 1. Bouwer H.,
    2. Rice R. C.

    (1976) A slug test for determining the hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifers with completely or partially penetrating wells. Water Resources Research 12:423–428.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
11. 1. Bugg S. F.,
    2. Lloyd J. W.

    (1976) A study of fresh water lens configuration in the Cayman Islands using resistivity methods. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology 9:291–302.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
12. 1. Burland J. B.,
    2. Burbridge M. C.

    (1985) Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Settlement of foundations on sand and gravel, 78, 1, pp 1325–1381.

    OpenUrl
13. 1. Clayton C. R.,
    2. Simons N. E.,
    3. Matthews M. C.

    (1982) Site Investigation (Granada Publishing, London).
14. 1. Cooper H. H.,
    2. Bredehoeft J. D.,
    3. Papadopulos I. S.

    (1967) Response of a finite diameter well to an instantaneous change of water. Water Resources Research 3:263–269.

    OpenUrlPubMed
15. 1. Cornwell J. D.

    (1985) Applications of geophysical methods to mapping unconsolidated sediments in East Anglia. Modern Geology 9:187–205.

    OpenUrl
16. 1. Croft M. G.

    (1971) A method of calculating permeability from electric logs, United States Geological Survey, Professional Paper 750B, pp B265–B269.
17. 1. Culshaw M. G.,
    2. Jackson P. D.,
    3. Mccann D. M.

    (1987) in Planning and Engineering Geology, Geophysical mapping techniques in environmental planning, Geological Society, London, Engineering Geology Special Publication, eds Culshaw M. G., Bell F. G., Cripps J. C., O’Hara M. 4, pp 171–177.

    OpenUrl
18. 1. D’Andrea D. V.,
    2. Fischer R. L.,
    3. Fogelson D. E.

    (1965) Prediction of compressive strength from other rock properties, United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, Report of Investigations 6702.
19. 1. Dearman W. R.,
    2. Baynes F. J.,
    3. Pearson R.

    (1977) Geophysical detection of disused mineshafts in the Newcastle upon Tyne area, NE England. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology 10:257–269.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
20. 1. Denness B.,
    2. Conway B. W.,
    3. McCann D. M.,
    4. Grainger P.

    (1975) Investigation of a coastal landslip at Charmouth, Dorset. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology 8:119–140.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
21. 1. De Ruiter J.

    (1982) Proceedings of the 2nd European Symposium on Penetration Testing, The static cone penetration test, state-of-the-art report (Amsterdam. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam), 2, pp 389–405.

    OpenUrl
22. 1. Dixon J. C.,
    2. Clarke K. B.

    (1975) in Site Investigations in Areas of Mining Subsidence, Field investigation techniques, ed Bell F. G. (Newnes-Butterworth, London), pp 40–74.
23. 1. Douglas D. L.

    (1983) in In Situ Testing for Geotechnical Investigations, The Standard penetration test, ed Ervin M. C. (A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam).
24. 1. Eaton G. P.,
    2. Martin N. W.,
    3. Murphy M. A.

    (1965) Application of gravity measurements to some problems in engineering geology. Bulletin of the Association of Engineering Geologists 3:6–21.

    OpenUrl
25. 1. Forster A.,
    2. McCann D. M.

    Reconnaissance geophysical methods in landslide investigations. Engineering Geology, In press.
26. 1. Gibson R. E.,
    2. Anderson W. F.

    (1961) In situ measurement of soil properties with the pressuremeter. Civil Engineering and Public Works Review 56:615–618.

    OpenUrl
27. 1. Gielly J.,
    2. Lareal P.,
    3. Sanglerat G.

    (1970) Proceedings of the Conference on In Situ Investigations in Soils and Rocks, Correlation between in situ penetration tests and the compressibility characteristics of soil (British Geotechnical Society, London), pp 167–172.
28. 1. Grainger P.,
    2. McCann D. M.,
    3. Gallois R. W.

    (1973) The application of the seismic refraction technique to the study of the fracturing of the Middle Chalk at Mundford, Norfolk. Geotechnique 23:219–232.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
29. 1. Heijnen W. J.

    (1973) Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Moscow, The Dutch cone test: a study of the shape of the electrical cone, 1, pp 181–184.

    OpenUrl
30. 1. Hooper J. A.

    (1973) Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Observations on the behaviour of a piled raft foundation on London Clay, 55, Part 2, pp 855–877.

    OpenUrl
31. 1. Hvorslev M. J.

    (1951) Time lag and soil permeability in groundwater observations, United States Waterways Experimental Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi, Bulletin No. 36.
32. 1. Jamiolkowski M.,
    2. Ladd C. C.,
    3. Germaine J. T.,
    4. Lancellotta R.

    (1985) Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, San Francisco, New developments in field and laboratory testing of soils (A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam), 1, pp 57–153.

    OpenUrl
33. 1. Johnson A. I.

    (1968) An outline of geophysical logging methods and their uses in hydraulic studies, United States Geological Survey, Water Supply Paper 1892, pp 158–164.
34. 1. Kay J. N.,
    2. Parry R. H. G.

    (1982) Screw plate tests in a stiff clay. Ground Engineering 15(6):22–30.

    OpenUrl
35. 1. Kearey P.,
    2. Brooks M.

    (1984) An introduction to geophysical exploration (Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford).
36. 1. Keller G. V.

    (1966) in Handbook of Physical Constants, Electrical properties of rocks and minerals, ed Clarke S. P. (American Geological Society), 97, pp 537–577.

    OpenUrl
37. 1. Kelly W. E.

    (1977) Geolectric sounding for estimating aquifer hydraulic conductivity. Ground Water 15(6):420–425.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
38. 1. Kollert R.

    (1969) Ground water exploration by the electrical resistivity method, ABEM Geophysical Memorandum 3/69 (Atlas Copco, Stockholm).
39. 1. La Rochelle P.,
    2. Roy M.,
    3. Tavenas F.

    (1973) Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Moscow, Field measurements of cohesion in Champlain clays, 1.1, pp 229–236.

    OpenUrl
40. 1. Lunne T.,
    2. Christoffersen H. P.

    (1985) Interpretations of cone penetrometer data for offshore sands, Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Publication, 156, pp 1–12.

    OpenUrl
41. 1. Marsland A.

    (1973a) Large in situ tests to measure the properties of stiff fissured clays, Building Research Establishment, Garston, Current Paper CP 1/73.
42. 1. Marsland A.

    (1973b) Laboratory and in situ measurements of the deformation moduli of London Clay, Building Research Establishment, Garston, Current Paper CP 24/73.
43. 1. Marsland A.

    (1974) Comparisons of the results from static penetration tests and large in-situ plate tests in London Clay, Building Research Establishment, Garston, Current Paper CP 87/74.
44. 1. Marsland A.

    (1976) The evaluation of the engineering design parameters for glacial clays. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology 10:1–26.

    OpenUrlPubMed
45. 1. Marsland A.

    (1980) Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Brighton, Relationships between the pressuremeter test and full scale behaviour of foundations, 4. 75.
46. 1. Marsland A.,
    2. Randolph M. F.

    (1977) Comparisons of the results from pressuremeter tests and large in-situ plate tests in London Clay. Geotechnique 27:217–243.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
47. 1. McCann D. M.,
    2. Culshaw M. G.,
    3. Northmore K. J.

    (1990) in Field Testsing in Engineering Geology, Rock mass assessment from seismic measurements, Geological Society, London, Engineering Geology Special Publication, eds Bell F. G., Culshaw M. G., Cripps J. C., Coffey J. R. 6, pp 257–266.

    OpenUrl
48. 1. McCann D. M.,
    2. Jackson P. D.,
    3. Culshaw M. G.

    (1987) The use of geophysical surveying methods in the detection of natural cavities and mineshafts. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology 20:59–73.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
49. 1. McDowell P.

    (1975) Detection of clay-filled sink holes in the chalk by geophysical methods. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology 8:303–310.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
50. 1. Meyerhof G. G.

    (1974) National Swedish Building Research, Stockholm. 2.1, Proceedings of the European Symposium on Penetration Testing, Stockholm, State-of-the-art of penetration testing in countries outside Europe, pp 40–48.
51. 1. Meigh A. C.,
    2. Greenland S. W.

    (1965) Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Montreal, In situ testing of soft rocks, 1, pp 73–76.

    OpenUrl
52. 1. Neumann R.

    (1977) Proceedings of the Symposium on Detection of Subsurface Cavities, Microgravity methods applied to the detection of cavities (Soils and Pavements Laboratory United States Waterways Experimental Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi).
53. 1. Oteri A. U.-E.

    (1983) Delineation of saline intrusion in the Dungeness shingle aquifer using surface geophysics. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology 16:43–51.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
54. 1. Peck R. B.,
    2. Hanson W. E.,
    3. Thorburn T. H.

    (1974) Foundation Engineering (Wiley, New York).
55. 1. Richardson A. M.,
    2. Brand E. W.,
    3. Memom A.

    (1975) Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers Conference on In Situ Measurement of Soil Properties, Raleigh, North Carolina, In situ determination of anisotropy of a soft clay, 1, pp 336–349.

    OpenUrl
56. 1. Rocha M.,
    2. Da Silvera A.,
    3. Grossman N.,
    4. De Oliveira E.

    (1966) Proceedings of the 1st Congress of the International Society of Rock Mechanics, Determination of the deforamability of rock masses along boreholes, (Lisbon), 3, pp 697–704.

    OpenUrl
57. 1. Rodin S.

    (1961) Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Paris, Experiments with penetrometers with particular reference to the standard penetration test, 1, pp 517–521.

    OpenUrl
58. 1. Sanglerat G.

    (1972) The penetrometer and soil exploration (Elsevier, Amsterdam).
59. 1. Schmertmann J. H.

    (1975) Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers Conference on In Situ Measurements of Soil Properties, Raleigh, North Carolina, Measurement of in situ shear strength, state-of-the-art report, 2, pp 57–138.

    OpenUrl
60. 1. Schmertmann J. H.

    (1978) Guidelines for cone penetration tests; performance and design, Department of Transportation, Federal Highways Administration Offices of Research and Development, Washington. Report No. TS-78-209.
61. 1. Schmertmann J. H.,
    2. Hartman J. P.,
    3. Brown P. R.

    (1978) Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers, Improved strain influence factor diagrams, 104, GT8, pp 1131–1135.

    OpenUrl
62. 1. Schultze E.,
    2. Melzer K. F.

    (1965) Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Montreal, The determination of the density and the modulus of compressibility of non-cohesive soils by soundings, 1, pp 354–358.

    OpenUrl
63. 1. Seed H. B.,
    2. Idriss I. M.,
    3. Arango I.

    (1983) Evaluation of liquefaction potential using field performance data. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 109:458–482.

    OpenUrl
64. 1. Serafim J. L.

    (1964) in State of Stress in the Earth’s Crust, Rock mechanics considerations in the design of concrete dams, ed Judd W. R. (Elsevier, New York), pp 611–650.
65. 1. Smith I. M.

    (1978) in Foundation Engineering in Difficult Ground, Computer predictions in difficult soil conditions, ed Bell F. G. (Butterworths, London), pp 143–160.
66. 1. Terzaghi K.,
    2. Peck R. B.

    (1967) Soil mechanics in engineering practice (Wiley, New York), 2nd edn.
67. 1. Tomlinson M. J.

    (1986) Foundation design and construction (Longman, London), 5th edn.
68. 1. Van de Berg H. G.

    (1987) in Ground Engineers Reference Book, In situ testing of soils, ed Bell F. G. (Butterworths, London), p 25, pp 1–23.
69. 1. Voort H.,
    2. Logters G.

    (1974) In situ determination of the deformation behaviour of a cubical rock mass sample under triaxial load. Rock mechanics 6:65–79.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
70. 1. Wakeling T. R. M.

    (1970) Proceedings of the Conference on In Situ Investigations in Soil and Rocks, A comparison of the results of standard site investigation methods against the results of a detailed geotechnical investigation in Middle Chalk at Mundford, Norfolk (British Geotechnical Society, London), pp 17–22.
71. 1. Ward W.H.,
    2. Burland J. B.,
    3. Gallois R. W.

    (1968) Geotechnical assessment of a site at Mundford, Norfolk for a large proton accelerator. Geotechnique 18:399–431.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
72. 1. Worthington P. F.

    (1973) Estimation of the permeability of a Bunter Sandstone aquifer from laboratory investigations and borehole resistivity measurements. Water and Water Engineering 77:251–257.

    OpenUrl
73. 1. Worthington P. F.,
    2. Griffiths D. H.

    (1975) The application of geophysical methods to the exploration and development of sandstone aquifers. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology 8:73–102.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
74. 1. Wroth C. P.,
    2. Hughes J. M. O.

    (1973) Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Moscow, An instrument for the in situ measurement of the properties of soft clays, 1, pp 487–494.

    OpenUrl
75. 1. Wyllie M. R. J.,
    2. Gregory A. R.,
    3. Gardner L. W.

    (1956) Elastic wave velocities in heterogeneous porous media. Geophysics 21:41–70.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text