Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Engineering Geology Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mortimore, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Duperret, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Engineering Geology Special Publications; 2004; v. 20; p. 75-88;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.ENG.2004.020.01.05
© 2004 Geological Society of London

Chalk physical properties and cliff instability

R. N. Mortimore1, K. J. Stone1, J. Lawrence1 & A. Duperret 2

1 Applied Geology Research Unit, School of the Environment, University of Brighton, Moulsecoomb, Brighton BN2 4GJ, UK
2 Laboratoire de Mécanique, Faculté des Sciences et Techniques, Université du Havre, 25 rue Phillipe Lebon, BP 540, 76058 Le Havre cedex, France

Physical properties such as porosity and intact dry density (IDD) are compared with strength testing in relation to the Chalk formations in the cliffs of the English Channel. Natural moisture contents are close to saturation moisture contents for chalks with intact dry densities above 1.70 Mg/m3. Below this IDD, the natural moisture contents show a much greater range and greater divergence from the saturation line. There is also an indication that certain types of chalk retain water at saturation level while others gain and lose water more readily. Strength tests (Point Load Index, Brazilian Crushing Strength and Uniaxial Compressive Strengths) show up to four times reductions in strength between dry (higher strength) and saturated (lower strength) samples. Absence of a strong correlation between density and strength is interpreted as resulting from either mineralogical differences in the samples and/or textural differences between different chalks. The variation in physical properties and strength in the different chalks forming the cliffs indicates the strong stratigraphical and sedimentological controls on mechanical performance of the material and mass in cliff failures.