Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Engineering Geology Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nicholls, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Geological Society, London, Engineering Geology Special Publications; 1998; v. 15; p. 71-76;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.ENG.1998.015.01.08
© 1998 Geological Society of London

Section 1: Coastal and fluvial geohazards

Assessing erosion of sandy beaches due to sea-level rise

Robert J. Nicholls

Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University, Queensway, Enfield EN3 4SF, UK

The prospect of accelerated sea-level rise in the coming century makes beach erosion more likely. Given the concentration of human habitation and infrastructure adjacent to sandy beaches, it is prudent to consider the implications of such changes. To select the most appropriate approach to evaluate this problem, three levels of increasingly complex assessment can be distinguished: (1) screening assessment (SA); (2) vulnerability assessment (VA); and (3) planning assessment (PA). SA and VA are amenable to analysis with a Bruun rule-based approach. SA can be quickly and effectively accomplished using a simple proportionality approach that shoreline recession is in the range of 100 to 200 times the sea-level rise scenario. For VA, a range of shoreline response scenarios can be estimated by selecting appropriate low and high offshore boundary conditions. PA ideally requires a comprehensive sediment budget approach. SA may trigger VA, which may in turn, trigger PA, depending on the results. The limitations of this structured approach are discussed.