Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Engineering Geology Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lienhart, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Geological Society, London, Engineering Geology Special Publications; 1998; v. 13; p. 91-106;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.ENG.1998.013.01.08
© 1998 Geological Society of London

Section 2: Armourstone evaluation and shingle performance assessment

Rock engineering rating system for assessing the suitability of armourstone sources

D. A. Lienhart

Rock Products Consultants, 7229 Longfield Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45243-2209, USA

The process involved in assessing and selecting a potential source of armourstone of suitable quality is one of great complexity. The process involves the inspection and evaluation of the quarry and its production methods, testing of the processed stone, evaluation of the quality of both intact and processed stone, and consideration of both the transportation methods and placement techniques. The entire process, from quarry selection to placement at the project, may be viewed as a rock engineering system. The use of a rock engineering interaction matrix simplifies an understanding of how various factors affecting the quality of quarried armourstone are interrelated. Through this understanding of the various interrelationships a weighted rock engineering rating system may be developed for the assessment of the suitability of various armourstone sources. Such a rating system is designed to pull together all the factors related to both the field and laboratory investigations of a potential source, enabling geologists at all experience levels to arrive at a well-founded conclusion concerning the potential quality of stone produced from a particular armourstone source.