Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Engineering Geology Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Howarth, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by French, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Geological Society, London, Engineering Geology Special Publications; 1998; v. 13; p. 169-183;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.ENG.1998.013.01.14
© 1998 Geological Society of London

Section 3: Aggregate testing and the use of alternative aggregates

A statistical study of aggregate testing data with respect to engineering judgement

Richard J. Howarth1 & William J. French2

1 Department of Geological Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
2 Geomaterials Group, School of Engineering, Queen Mary and Westfield College, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK

Aspects of product-testing and measurement uncertainty are addressed with the intention of providing guidelines to enable engineering judgements to be made which are based on valid scientific criteria. Suggestions are made to enable improved estimates of: (1) the critical range when defining measurement uncertainty; (2) the number of tests required to ensure, with a stated probability, that there is a 95% probability that the estimated mean lies within a stated absolute amount of the underlying population mean; (3) confidence intervals for a single determination; (4) confidence intervals on observed abundance in point- or grain-counts, including an exact upper bound on the proportion of a constituent which could be present (e.g. opal or chert as a contaminant) when no occurrences have been observed; (5) confidence interval on the proportion of sub-standard product present in a source of bulk material, on the basis of routine testing of a continuously delivered product, J-charts for the mean and range are also introduced as an aid to quality assurance. These have excellent performance compared to the better-known Shewhart and cusum charts and are well-suited to manual implementation at a ‘shop-floor’ level.